Abstract

Bleeding time is still widely performed in many developing countries including Thailand. To generate an accurate result, the procedure should be complied with standard recommendations such as those from Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH). The authors surveyed the current practices of bleeding time in Thailand in order to verify the practices that did not comply with the accepted standard. The questionnaires were sent to hospitals participating Thailand National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for blood coagulation. Items in the questionnaire comprised information about preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical issues of bleeding time. From a dispatch of 201 questionnaires, 155 (77.1%) were returned. The common noncompliance with standards observed in this survey included inappropriateness of indication, e.g. use for preoperative screening (95 of 126, 75.4%), use of devices other than standard template (130 of 132, 98.5%), and inappropriate reference range (125 of 127, 98.4%). The noncompliance shown in this survey can affect the accuracy of bleeding time results. The authors would like to address these problems as an alert for other laboratories especially in the developing countries where the standard templates are not widely available.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.