Abstract

We aimed to investigate the current practice and perspectives of healthcare providers (HCPs) regarding preconception care (PCC) for women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in China. A questionnaire based on in-depth interviews with HCPs involved in PCC was released online and advertised via doctor unions in China. The data were categorical variables and were analysed by multivariable logistic regression, Chi-square test, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. From November 2016 to January 2017, 992 responses from 31 provinces of China were received (77.3% doctors and 22.7% nurses). Regarding the current status of PCC for T1D, 62.5% of HCPs treated ≤1 woman with T1D monthly on average. Only 16.5% thought they provided proper PCC, and 29.6% reported having sufficient knowledge. Regarding attitudes towards pregnancy with T1D, 92.2% were in favour of women with T1D getting pregnant after proper glycaemic control, and 94.7% perceived their worries regarding pregnancy. Regarding doctor-patient communication, 56.6% spent <10min per visit, while 58.3% thought ≥20min was required for adequate communication. HCPs emphasised the importance of multidisciplinary PCC, professional training, and social support. PCC practice was associated with hospital level (OR=2.450, 95%CI: 1.580-3.799, p<0.001), HCPs' experience of treating women with T1D (OR=2.196, 95%CI: 1.516-3.180, p<0.001), and their communication sufficiency (OR=3.706, 95%CI: 2.550-5.387, p<0.001). The current PCC practice for T1D in China was suboptimal and it was associated with hospital level, HCPs' experience and communication. It is necessary to reinforce professional training and appeal for social resources to improve PCC.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.