Abstract
Candida infections represent challenging causes of severe sepsis and/or of septic shock in the critically ill patients. Knowledge of current pharmacological concepts may promote a more wise use of echinocandins in the management of Candida infections in this setting. Echinocandins have some advantages over azoles, both pharmacodynamically (rapid fungicidal activity, anti-biofilm activity, unmodified activity against Candida isolates with decreased susceptibility to azoles and anti-cytokine/anti-chemokine activity) and pharmacokinetically (low interindividual variability, low potential for drug–drug interactions), that may influence the timing and the choice of therapy of Candida diseases in the critically ill patients. However, concerns exist in regards to the feasibility of fixed dosing regimens of echinocandins in all of the different patient populations and in regards to the effectiveness of echinocandin monotherapy in some clinical settings. In presence of deep-seated infections, voriconazole or liposomal amphotericin B may be valuable alternatives or add-on therapy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.