Abstract
Childhood growth and nutrition is internationally recognised as an area of importance in every child’s development. Malnutrition is defined as a state of deficiency, excess or imbalance of nutrition which has an adverse affect on bodily function (1) . Adult under-nutrition is well recognised and extensively researched, leading to the development of guidelines, policies and nutrition screening tools to address the problem (2–4) . However, there is a lack of similar research in paediatric practice. Under-nutrition in children remains a concern with estimates that 8–79% of hospitalised children are at risk of under-nutrition (5) . As under-nutrition gains greater recognition by health care professionals, the demands on dietetic services are expected to increase, however, there are currently no measures in place by which to monitor this. The aim of the present study was to examine current dietetic and nutrition practices in paediatric centres across the UK and Ireland. The Children’s Nutrition Survey was undertaken during January and February 2010. Hospitals were approached through publications in Dietetics Today, the Paediatric Group of the British Dietetic Association or by direct contact with the centres. Participating centres were asked to complete a 2-page questionnaire regarding services and practices within their centres. This questionnaire was adapted, with permission, from the BAPEN Adult Nutrition Screening Week 2010 questionnaire. A total of 27 centres participated in the survey: 7 specialist paediatric hospitals and 20 district general/single wards. Of these 13 (48 %) hospitals reported the presence of a nutrition support team or nutrition steering committee. Only 8 centres could define their referral rates (the percentage of referrals to dietetic services from total number of in-patients), of which 5 defined their rate as falling within the lowest quartile of 0–25 %. Most centres reported that they were not currently using nutrition screening tools. Nutrition related information was routinely included in the discharge plan of only 6 (22 %) centres surveyed. Of note, centres that reported having a nutrition support team or steering committee tended to be more likely to record height on admission; however, this was not found to be statistically significant as a result of the small sample size.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
