Abstract
In a case study current methodologies for chemical compound searching in patents were assessed. The dyestuff Disperse Orange 25 was used to compare search results obtained from different database categories. Namely, search results from three databases with automated chemical compound recognition (SciWalker, SureChEMBL, Patentscope), a full-text database (FullPat), and a value added database (CAPLUS) were compared. Most databases retrieved unique hit documents. The working thesis that databases with automated chemical compound recognition might substitute traditional databases could not be confirmed. For patent searches aiming completeness with regard to specific chemical compounds, the combined use of databases from all categories is needed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
