Abstract

With an increasing capacity in the converter-based generation to the modern power system, a growing demand for such systems to be more grid-friendly has emerged. Consequently, grid-forming converters have been proposed as a promising solution as they are compatible with the conventional synchronous-machine-based power system. However, most research focuses on the grid-forming control during normal operating conditions without considering the fundamental distinction between a grid-forming converter and a synchronous machine when considering its short-circuit capability. The current limitation of grid-forming converters during fault conditions is not well described in the available literature and present solutions often aim to switch the control structure to a grid-following structure during the fault. Yet, for a future converter-based power system with no or little integration of synchronous machines, the converters need to preserve their voltage-mode characteristics and be robust toward weak-grid conditions. To address this issue, this article discusses the fundamental issue of grid-forming converter control during grid fault conditions and proposes a fault-mode controller which keeps the voltage-mode characteristics of the grid-forming structure while simultaneously limiting the converter currents to an admissible value. The proposed method is evaluated in a detailed simulation model and verified through an experimental test setup.

Highlights

  • A CRITICAL issue of the power system transitioning toward renewable energy sources is the gradual retirement of the bulk generation supplied by large synchronous machines

  • Conventional power systems dominated by synchronous machines both facilitate synchronizing torque, damping, and high system inertia which act as the primary ancillary support to the network during disturbances

  • Even though the Synchronous Power Controller (SPC) can provide grid-supporting functionalities, provided that a power reserve is available, which enhances the transient stability of the network, the synchronization stability of the converter may be diminished in case of grid faults when including current limiters [32]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A CRITICAL issue of the power system transitioning toward renewable energy sources is the gradual retirement of the bulk generation supplied by large synchronous machines. As described in [17], [18], there are mainly two methods which can provide current limitation and stability for gridforming converter under large-signal disturbances: switching the control structure to the grid-following mode during the fault and limiting the converter currents using a virtual admittance structure. For the methods that directly limit the current references, either the outer power loops and droop controllers are not considered or wind-up and instability is encountered. Droop control is contained in the outer two loops to determine the active and reactive power references based on the deviation of the network voltage and frequency. The SPC uses the internal synchronization mechanism in ac networks similar to a synchronous machine This inherent power-based synchronization structure is obtained by using a regulator of the active power error, the PLC, to generate the synchronization angle/frequency. The inner current controller is a proportional-resonant (PR) controller implemented in the αβ-reference frame as in [30] and [31]

CONTROL ISSUES WITH GRID-FORMING CONVERTERS DURING GRID FAULTS
ENHANCED FAULT RIDE-THROUGH OF GRID-FORMING CONVERTER
Current Limitation and Reference Power Adjustment
Enhanced Fault Recovery Using Dynamic Damping
Method Comparison and Weak-Grid Performance
EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call