Abstract

There has been an exponential growth in the volume of shoulder surgery in the last 2 decades and a very wide variety of anaesthetic techniques have emerged to provide anaesthesia and post-operative analgesia. In this article we examine current opinion, risks, benefits and practicalities of anaesthetic practice and the provision of post-operative analgesia for shoulder surgery.

Highlights

  • There is considerable diversity in the manner in which anaesthetists approach the provision of shoulder surgery

  • Advances in minimally invasive techniques are extending the benefits of shoulder surgery to ever more frail patients with greater co-morbidity who would normally be regarded as very high risk for general anaesthesia

  • Some concerns have been raised regarding the the possibility of amide local anaesthetics (LA) induced chondrotoxicity manifesting as devastating post-arthroscopic glenohumeral chondrolysis (PAGCL) and there does seem to be in vitro evidence to this effect [25], more pronounced for lignocaine than bupivacaine [26]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is considerable diversity in the manner in which anaesthetists approach the provision of shoulder surgery. No regional anaesthetic technique has a 100% success rate and even with a successful nerve block the risk of inadequate analgesia necessitating conversion to general anaesthesia persist, with conversion rates upto 8.7-13% in some series [10, 11]. Anaesthesia for Shoulder Surgery epinephrine, Kim et al found that perineural dexamethasone with SSISB provided lower pain scores with an effect extending up to 48 hours [34].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call