Abstract

Cancer cells escape immune recognition by exploiting the programmed cell-death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell-death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint axis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors that target PD-1/PD-L1 unleash the properties of effector T cells that are licensed to kill cancer cells. Immune checkpoint blockade has dramatically changed the treatment landscape of many cancers. Following the cancer paradigm, preliminary results of clinical trials in lymphoma have demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors induce remarkable responses in specific subtypes, most notably classical Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, while in other subtypes, the results vary considerably, from promising to disappointing. Lymphomas that respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors tend to exhibit tumor cells that reside in a T-cell-rich immune microenvironment and display constitutive transcriptional upregulation of genes that facilitate innate immune resistance, such as structural variations of the PD-L1 locus, collectively referred to as T-cell-inflamed lymphomas, while those lacking such characteristics are referred to as noninflamed lymphomas. This distinction is not necessarily a sine qua non of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, but rather a framework to move the field forward with a more rational approach. In this article, we provide insights on our current understanding of the biological mechanisms of immune checkpoint evasion in specific subtypes of B-cell and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas and summarize the clinical experience of using inhibitors that target immune checkpoints in these subtypes. We also discuss the phenomenon of hyperprogression in T-cell lymphomas, related to the use of such inhibitors when T cells themselves are the target cells, and consider future approaches to refine clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

Highlights

  • The immune system with an orchestrated function of its “machinery” has the capacity to control the immune response to foreign and self-antigens, preventing autoimmunity

  • This fine tuning is regulated by the immune-checkpoint axis which serves as a “break” to avoid overheating of the “machinery.” The central checkpoint occurs in the lymphoid organs during priming and involves the inhibitory function of the checkpoint molecule cytotoxic T-lymphocyteassociated protein 4 (CTLA-4), which prevents T cells from becoming fully activated upon strong antigen stimulation [1]

  • This review provides an overview of our current understanding of the biological principles and rationale behind immune checkpoint inhibition in non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), a summary of published and ongoing clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and macrophage checkpoint inhibition (MCI) in NHLs, and a point of view on the current status and the prospects of moving the field forward in the future

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The immune system with an orchestrated function of its “machinery” has the capacity to control the immune response to foreign and self-antigens, preventing autoimmunity. Data generated from genomic studies and observations in unselected patients from clinical studies of ICIs in NHL, mainly of the large B-cell subtype, suggest that lymphomas with a T-cell-inflamed phenotype collectively share common characteristics, including a Tcell immune surveillance infiltrate [29], genomic alterations that drive overexpression of PD-L1 [23, 26,27,28, 30, 31], and cell-intrinsic NF-κΒ activation [32,33,34]. Specific histologic subtypes of NHL will be addressed for the biology of their immune environment, accounting for characteristics that associate with an inflamed phenotype, followed by results of clinical studies in these subtypes and a point of view on current and future directions in these disease entities (summarized in Tables 1 and 2)

Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas
Nivolumab in combination with pomalidomide
Richter Transformation of CLL
Indolent B Cell Lymphomas
Follicular Lymphoma
Point of View on ICIs in B-Cell NHL
Point of View on ICIs in PTCL
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.