Abstract

In patients with suspected venous thromboembolism, the goal is to accurately and rapidly identify those with and without thrombosis. Failure to diagnose venous thromboembolism (VTE) can lead to fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and unnecessary anticoagulation can cause avoidable bleeding. The adoption of a structured approach to VTE diagnosis, that includes clinical prediction rules, D-dimer testing and non-invasive imaging modalities, has enabled rapid, cost-effective and accurate VTE diagnosis, but problems still persist. First, with increased reliance on imaging and widespread use of sensitive multidetector computed tomography (CT) scanners, there is a potential for overdiagnosis of VTE. Second, the optimal strategy for diagnosing recurrent leg deep venous thrombosis remains unclear as is that for venous thrombosis at unusual sites. Third, the conventional diagnostic approach is inefficient in that it is unable to exclude VTE in high-risk patients. In this review, we outline pragmatic approaches for the clinician faced with difficult VTE diagnostic cases. In addition to discussing the principles of the current diagnostic framework, we explore the diagnostic approach to recurrent VTE, isolated distal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), pregnancy associated VTE, subsegmental PE, and VTE diagnosis in complex medical patients (including those with impaired renal function).

Highlights

  • Venous thromboembolism (VTE) consists of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), and occurs in approximately 1 in 1000 persons per year [1,2]

  • The pretest probability approach uses a higher D-dimer threshold for patients with a lower pretest probability, thereby ruling out DVT in a greater proportion of patients with low pretest probability [34,35]. While this has not been validated in evaluation of recurrent DVTs, patients with prior VTE were included in these studies and made up 8% and 10% of the respective study populations [34]

  • For patients with high bleeding risk or those who may require further therapy we feel that the benefits of a quick diagnosis via computed tomography (CT) generally outweigh the risks of Contrast induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) consists of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), and occurs in approximately 1 in 1000 persons per year [1,2]. Advances in diagnostic strategies have helped to reduce the number of imaging tests required in patients with suspected VTE, while missing few patients who would have benefited from treatment. These diagnostic strategies for VTE can be considered in several phases—first the patient’s history and physical examination lead the clinician to suspect VTE; second, screening tests to rule out VTE may be performed; and patients in whom VTE cannot be ruled out undergo a more definitive imaging study. We describe the current approaches to diagnosis of VTE and focus on areas that require improvement

Initial Suspicion of VTE
Clinical Prediction Rules
Biomarkers
Imaging Tests
Case 1
Part 1
Part 2
Case 2
Case 3
Areas of Future Research
How to Reduce Overuse of Imaging Tests and Overdiagnosis of VTE?
Findings
How to Risk Stratify Patients with Venous Thrombosis at Distal Sites?
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call