Abstract
Objective: comparative analysis of the used methods of surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Methodology for writing a review. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search and analysis of articles published in the scientific databases e-Library, PubMed, Google Scholar for the period from 2015 to 2023 was carried out. After excluding publications that did not correspond to the search, 50 articles were selected for analysis. Conclusion. According to the study, each of the currently used methods of surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse has its own advantages and disadvantages, which makes it possible to select the optimal surgical option in each specific case. The determining factors when choosing a surgical intervention are the following factors: the patient's age, the presence of comorbid pathologies, including benign neoplasms, planning or not planning a pregnancy in the future.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
