Abstract

Recent advances in instrumentation and software have resulted in cryo-EM rapidly becoming the method of choice for structural biologists, especially for those studying the three-dimensional structures of very large macromolecular complexes. In this contribution, the tools available for macromolecular structure refinement into cryo-EM reconstructions that are available via CCP-EM are reviewed, specifically focusing on REFMAC5 and related tools. Whilst originally designed with a view to refinement against X-ray diffraction data, some of these tools have been able to be repurposed for cryo-EM owing to the same principles being applicable to refinement against cryo-EM maps. Since both techniques are used to elucidate macromolecular structures, tools encapsulating prior knowledge about macromolecules can easily be transferred. However, there are some significant qualitative differences that must be acknowledged and accounted for; relevant differences between these techniques are highlighted. The importance of phases is considered and the potential utility of replacing inaccurate amplitudes with their expectations is justified. More pragmatically, an upper bound on the correlation between observed and calculated Fourier coefficients, expressed in terms of the Fourier shell correlation between half-maps, is demonstrated. The importance of selecting appropriate levels of map blurring/sharpening is emphasized, which may be facilitated by considering the behaviour of the average map amplitude at different resolutions, as well as the utility of simultaneously viewing multiple blurred/sharpened maps. Features that are important for the purposes of computational efficiency are discussed, notably the Divide and Conquer pipeline for the parallel refinement of large macromolecular complexes. Techniques that have recently been developed or improved in Coot to facilitate and expedite the building, fitting and refinement of atomic models into cryo-EM maps are summarized. Finally, a tool for symmetry identification from a given map or coordinate set, ProSHADE, which can identify the point group of a map and thus may be used during deposition as well as during molecular visualization, is introduced.

Highlights

  • Macromolecular X-ray crystallography (MX), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and cryo-electron microscopy are the three main experimental techniques that are used to elucidate macromolecular structures in order to answer biological questions

  • We review the tools available for macromolecular structure refinement into cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) reconstructions that are available via CCP-EM (Burnley et al, 2017)

  • We anticipate that the Divide and Conquer algorithm will become useful in facilitating the refinement of large molecules with potentially multiple maps corresponding to multiple focused reconstructions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Macromolecular X-ray crystallography (MX), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) are the three main experimental techniques that are used to elucidate macromolecular structures in order to answer biological questions. This contrasts with atomic model refinement in cryo-EM, in which the ‘observations’ are taken to be the electrostatic potential maps: the outputs of the three-dimensional reconstruction process, which do contain phase information. (vii) Cryo-EM maps represent electrostatic potential, whereas the maps typically viewed corresponding to MX data represent electron density (calculated using phase information from the current state of the model). Cryo-EM atomic model refinement can be considered as the problem of fitting into the map whilst ensuring consistency with prior information, ensuring chemical and structural integrity of the model according to our current knowledge of macromolecular structures In this contribution, we review the tools available for macromolecular structure refinement into cryo-EM reconstructions that are available via CCP-EM (Burnley et al, 2017). It should be emphasized that the recommendations and features described in this contribution relate to the current state of existing software tools; in future it would be advantageous for improved techniques and tools to be developed and implemented

The importance of phases
Correlation between atomic model and observed maps
Blurring and sharpening
Selected tools for atomic model refinement
Prior information
Box-size selection
Divide and Conquer
Other relevant tools for model refinement in REFMAC5 and Coot
Rotational symmetry
Rotational symmetry detection using rotation function
Discussion
Findings
Future perspectives
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call