Abstract
Three participants in the panel “Curatorial Practice as Production of Visual and Spatial Knowledge” reflect upon the ideas raised in their discussion about curating, both in their respective fields and as a general practice. The panel was a part of Debating Visual Knowledge, a symposium organized by graduate students in Information Science and History of Art and Architecture at the University of Pittsburgh, October 3–5, 2014. A transcription of the panel is available in this issue.
Highlights
About the Author Dr Alison Langmead is the director of the Visual Media Workshop in the Department of History of Art and Architecture and Assistant Professor in the School of Information Scienes at the University of Pittsburgh
Three participants in the panel “Curatorial Practice as Production of Visual and Spatial Knowledge” reflect upon the ideas raised in their discussion about curating, both in their respective fields and as a general practice
Alison Langmead: Upon rereading our conversation, I was struck by a number of themes produced by our interactions, and I appreciate being given the opportunity here to reflect upon a few of them
Summary
Three participants in the panel “Curatorial Practice as Production of Visual and Spatial Knowledge” reflect upon the ideas raised in their discussion about curating, both in their respective fields and as a general practice. Terry picked up on this theme when he discussed the ways in which curated exhibitions produce meaning as a network of interactions between the works of art, and the works of art and the visitor.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
