Abstract

Functional genetic polymorphisms in the brain dopamine (DA) system have been suggested to underlie individual differences in response inhibition, namely the suppression of a prepotent or inappropriate action. However, findings on associations between single DA polymorphisms and inhibitory control often are mixed, partly due to their small effect sizes. In the present study, a cumulative genetic score (CGS) was used: alleles previously associated with both impulsive behavior and lower baseline DA level, precisely the DRD4 Exon III 7-repeat, DAT1 VNTR 10-repeat and the COMT 158val allele, each added a point to the DA-CGS. Participants (N = 128) completed a Go/No-Go task varying in difficulty and EEG recordings were made with focus on the NoGo-P3, an ERP that reflects inhibitory response processes. We found a higher DA-CGS (lower basal/tonic DA level) to be associated with better performance (lower %FA and more adaptive responding) in the very demanding/rapid than in the less demanding/rapid condition, whereas the reverse pattern was true for individuals with a lower DA-CGS. A similar interaction pattern of DA-CGS and task condition was found for NoGo-P3 amplitude. In line with assumptions of distinct optimum DA levels for different cognitive demands, a DA-CGS-dependent variation of tonic DA levels could have modulated the balance between cognitive stability and flexibility, thereby affecting the optimal DA level required for the specific task condition. Moreover, a task demand-dependent phasic DA release might have added to the DA-CGS-related basal/tonic DA levels, thereby additionally affecting the balance between flexibility and stability, in turn influencing performance and NoGo-P3.

Highlights

  • Inhibition or inhibitory control denotes the ability to effectively suppress stimuli, behavioral responses or impulses, habits, and memories that are currently irrelevant, interfering, incorrect, or inappropriate to perform goal-directed behavior

  • We applied a cumulative genetic score of these genetic variations, which we examined with regard to behavioral and electrophysiological indicators of response inhibition

  • Because the NoGo-P3 is suggested to be more indicative of motor response inhibition, this study focused on NoGo-P3 amplitude, while the analysis of the relationship between DACGS and NoGo-N2 was exploratory in nature

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inhibition or inhibitory control denotes the ability to effectively suppress stimuli, behavioral responses or impulses, habits, and memories that are currently irrelevant, interfering, incorrect, or inappropriate to perform goal-directed behavior. Inhibition is considered being a part of executive functioning (Miyake et al, 2000), commonly distinguished in cognitive and motor forms of inhibition (Bari & Robbins, 2013). Response inhibition, namely the suppression of prepotent or inappropriate actions is considered a primary form of motor inhibition that shares an overlapping neural basis with other (cognitive) forms of inhibition and has been associated with various aspects of impulsivityrelated behavior (Chamberlain, Fineberg, Blackwell, Robbins, & Sahakian, 2006; Cohen & Lieberman, 2010; Smith, Jamadar, Provost, & Michie, 2013). Failure of inhibitory control has been repeatedly associated with pathologies, such as ADHD (Fisher, Aharon-Peretz, & Pratt, 2011; Nigg, 2001), substance abuse (Smith, Mattick, Jamadar, & Iredale, 2014), or obsessive-compulsive disorder (Chamberlain et al, 2006)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call