Cultured Skin in the Modern Era and the Impact of Infrastructure Volatility on Learning Curves: A 33-Year Institutional Review

Abstract

Abstract Finding a perfect epidermal transplant remains a holy grail of burn surgery. The epidermis is a site of stem cells that allows for the epithelial regeneration. The use of CEA for the treatment of major burns was first reported in 1981. CEA requires specialized skills; thus, reports from different burn-centers have shown mixed results. Comparing our modern data with past data shows how this field has advanced while maintaining institutional control. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted between 01/01/1988-12/31/2021 for massive burns that were managed with CEA. Patients were divided into pre-defined groups: G1(early-era)=1988-1999, G2(pre-modern-era)=2000-2010, and G3(modern-era)=2011-2021. We compared demographics, %TBSA, presence of inhalation-injury, LOS, complications, and mortality. We treated 52 patients with CEA during the study period. In the modern-era, we found 11 patients; in the pre-modern-era, 10; and in the early-era, 31. Injury characteristics, including %TBSA and the presence of inhalation-injury, were not significantly different between the groups. We observed lower mortality rates in G1 and G3 (G1:20% vs. G2:42% vs. G3:27%, p<0.05), although the predicted mortality was not significantly different between the groups (G1:50% vs. G2:47% vs. G3:49%, NS). Patients in G1 also had a shorter hospital LOS, in days, (G1:90 vs. G2:127 vs. G3:205, p<0.05). Finally, the surface-area grafted per patient was the highest in G2 (G1:2,000cm2 vs. G2:4,187cm2 vs. G3:4,090cm2, p<0.01). CEA has not gained popularity despite proven positive outcomes. Our retrospective analysis showed that CEA should be considered as a treatment option for patients with large burns, given proper training and infrastructure.