Abstract

In order to measure the impact of culture and a state’s identity on state behavior in international crises, specifically in regards to mediation and its outcome, this paper tests hypotheses rooted in both the international relations and cross-cultural psychology literatures, implementing analysis at both the international system level and the domestic state actor level. At the international system level, this paper finds that cultural difference between adversaries affects whether or not mediation occurs during an international crisis, but not whether or not these mediations are effective in reducing tensions if they do occur. At the domestic state actor level, we find that there are certain facets of cultural identity that lead to a state being more or less open to requesting or accepting third-party mediation during an international crisis, and others that affect whether or not these mediations are effective in reducing tensions.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.