Abstract

There is an opinion that the chronological aging (ChA) of yeast and the stationary phase aging (SPA) of cultured animal and human cells are a consequence of growth medium acidification. However, a number of recent publications indicate that, although this process has a certain influence on the rate of “aging” of cells in the stationary growth phase, it does not determine it completely. Apparently, the key factor in this case is the restriction of cell proliferation, which leads to cell “aging” even under physiologically optimal conditions. During yeast ChA and mammalian cell SPA, the medium is getting acidified to pH ≤ 4. Prevention of acidification can prolong the culture life span, but the cells will still die, although at a slower rate. Effects of medium acidification during ChA and SPA can be explained by activation of highly conserved growth signaling pathways leading to oxidative stress, and these processes, in turn, can play a role in aging of multicellular organisms and development of age-related diseases. Our previous experiments on the effect of buffer capacity of growth medium on SPA of transformed Chinese hamster cells showed that 20 mM HEPES had no effect on cell growth rate; in addition, the growth curves of experimental and control cells reached a plateau on the same day. However, the cell saturation density in the medium with HEPES was lower (i.e., the cells were “older” in terms of the gerontological cell kinetics model); on the other hand, the rate of SPA was markedly reduced, compared to the control, although the cells were still “getting older.” It can be assumed that extracellular pH (by the way, well correlated with intracellular pH) is an important factor (I.A. Arshavsky’s concept of the role of acidic alteration in aging) but not the key factor determining the survival of cells in a stationary culture.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call