Abstract

This analysis studies the development of Walter Benjamin’s aestheticization of politics, Debold’s culture of spectacle, Michel Foucault’s regulatory power, and outlines their key characteristics in the course of post-coronavirus art world. Taken together, it examines the totalitarian and collective cohesiveness of arts reproduction in the digital spatiality, and argues that there is the continuing cultural surveillance to shape aesthetic communication, in its evolution from celluloid resurrection to streaming media. It evaluates some consequences of cultural classification struggle, and arts mediocrity have been taken up and developed in the power circuit of media agencies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.