Abstract

The article deals with a phenomenon of bilingualism of Soviet national writers, who created their works both in mother-tongue and Russian language, and exceptionally in Russian. The brightest example of such kind of an artist is Kyrgyz classical writer of the second part of the 20th century Chingiz Aitmatov. The aim of our research was to define Chingiz Aitmatov’s cultural self-identification in a situation of bilingualism in his native Kyrgyzstan during Soviet times. The function of Russian language and culture for Chingiz Aitmatov’s creative works and author’s reflection concerning such issue as Russian culture as a mediator in familiarizing of small nations of the USSR with the world cultural heritage were also studied. Aitmatov considered the Russian language to be a “no compromise one” for USSR nations and small peoples in common Soviet informational space, particularly literary, in a process of integration to the global political, economic, and cultural heritage. At the same time, he put Russian culture in one cohort with the leading world cultures. According to Aitmatov, Russian cultural space had a great influence on the development of Soviet nations of Central Asia and became a mediator in a process of integration of small nations into the global cultural space. The Russian language was a helpful tool for acquaintance with the ancestry of world cultures.

Highlights

  • Soviet Union as an empire got together into its structure various ethnic groups regarding their economic, political, cultural, and religious specific traits

  • The majority of European, Transcaucasian, and partially Asian colonial nations of Russian empire mentally were ready for creating modern states, what was starkly illustrated by Poles, Finns, Estonians, Latvians, and Lithuanians

  • In the context of the Soviet Russian empire, many writers from republic colonies started to use actively the Russian language for their writings with a purpose to have a wider range of readers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soviet Union as an empire got together into its structure various ethnic groups regarding their economic, political, cultural, and religious specific traits. The majority of European, Transcaucasian, and partially Asian colonial nations of Russian empire mentally were ready for creating modern states, what was starkly illustrated by Poles, Finns, Estonians, Latvians, and Lithuanians. For many Asian ethnic groups, the advent of Soviet power to their lands was at the same time the advent of civilization, literacy, and contemporary culture. That is why big and small nations of Central Asia (including Kyrgyz), Siberia, Far East hold the advent of imperialistic Russian power and culture predominately as a positive event in their own history

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call