Abstract
This paper discusses two sub-themes emerging from Robert Innis’ article on philosophy and cultural psychology. First, the distinction between the two fields of inquiry is discussed, and it is argued that a traditional separation of a normative philosophy and a descriptive and explanatory psychology cannot hold, because of the inherent normativity of all things psychological, as argued among others by John Dewey. Second, Innis’ search for a normative frame for cultural psychology is continued by moving in two directions at the same time: One that locates the source of normativity in historically evolved social practices (following the work of Alasdair MacIntyre), and another that looks phenomenologically at the ethical demand arising from human interdependency (following the work of Emmanuel Lévinas and K. E. Løgstrup). Such a two-sided normative frame can possibly acknowledge both the historicity of human morality and the existence of certain universal moral values.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.