Abstract

In 1992, mainstream Euro-America demonstrated the short, selective, and sanitized character of both the national memory and the official history that sustains it by celebrating an anniversary: the Columbus Quincentenary, the ”discovery” of the ”New World.” The vast majority of activities generated by this event were festive and culturally self-congratulatory. Yet there were powerful subcurrents of protest, indigenous and otherwise, in wide evidence, contesting the sharply edited, profoundly revisionist nature of the commemoration. They drove home the moral and methodological implications of the fact that history is not only written from a particular standpoint, but that that standpoint has been of the colonizers, not the colonized.’ The response of Native America was also a determined assertion of presence and continuity, pointedly captured by the defiant counter spilling over with tshirts, posters and bumper stickers: “Still Here! Celebrating 49,500 years . . . before Columbus.” Partly as a result of these cultural dynamics, the writing of history has become more problematic within the general public’s awareness. Some began openly to question longstanding practices, notably the racist dimensions of the continued stereotyping of Indian people by Hollywood, the media, and the sporting

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.