Abstract

This paper presents a study of the emergence of environmental management institutions in Maine’s blueberry industry. We follow a cultural evolutionary approach to understand the factors that influenced the emergence of these institutions in environmental collective action problems. Specifically, we use a cultural multilevel selection framework to explore the prediction that collective action and institutions of environmental management emerge when cultural selection is the strongest among social groups positioned to solve a given collective action problem. To do this, we construct an evidence typology suited for a historical evolutionary analysis. We find that the scale of cultural adaptation responded to scale of the most pressing adaptive problem. The case study provides support for the group-level selection theory of institutional evolution, and displays patterns of institutional adaptation that respond to changing conditions over time. We argue that the dominant level of selection concept in multilevel selection theory helps to clarify how matches and mismatches between resource scale and institutional scale arise. We conclude that cultural evolutionary theory provides a general causal framework for organizing evidence, and complements the study of environmental history, which provides the temporal depth needed to examine evolutionary hypotheses.

Highlights

  • This article explores the historical emergence of environmental institutions in the American agriculture

  • This paper presents a study of the emergence of environmental management institutions in Maine’s blueberry industry

  • We follow a cultural evolutionary approach to understand the factors that influenced the emergence of these institutions in environmental collective action problems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article explores the historical emergence of environmental institutions in the American agriculture. Building on the foundation of humans as a uniquely cooperative species, Waring et al (2015) present a simplified conceptual framework that emphasizes the evolution of cooperative cultural traits within social groups Their cultural multilevel selection framework is most useful for studying collective action problems and social dilemmas over environmental resource use. The second category of evidence is composed of indicators that a given trait is a group-level cultural adaptation These include (4) the existence of in-group cooperation—costly individual action with clear group benefits, (5) individual behaviours that support cooperation (such as coordination, task specialization, punishment of free-riders), and (6) the strong group culture or supporting institutions. We make use of this evidence typology to make historical inferences

Background
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call