Cultural differences in ethics and values during conflict resolution: A disentangling approach

Abstract

Using a social motives framework, I tested two process models that linked ethical beliefs of Relativism and Idealism to conflict resolution preferences of Compromise and Forcing through social values (Face, Collectivism, Dignity, and Honor). Cultural relativity of the models was assessed across three-cultural subgroups (Confucian, Hindu, and Aristotelian). Results revealed that the process model for Idealism held across cultures as Idealism was indirectly related to Forcing through Dignity and Honor. However, the results suggested that the process model for Relativism differed across cultural groups as Relativism was indirectly related to Compromise through both Face and Collectivism for Confucian cultures, but indirectly related to Compromise through Collectivism for Hindu cultures, and indirectly related to Compromise through Face for Aristotelian cultures. By examining the relationships between ethical beliefs and social values commonly attributed to cultural differences in conflict resolution preferences, the study disentangles the culture-specific and culture-free relationships which are important to resolving interpersonal conflict.