Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine cultural differences in perceptions of distributive and procedural justice. Four different structural equation models of the relationship between distributive and procedural justice and their impact on systemic and individual outcome variables were tested. The models are similar to those tested by Sweeney and McFarlin, who found support for a two-factor model in a sample of employees from the United States. The models in the current study were tested on a sample of full-time employees working in Hong Kong. Support for cultural differences was found, as the two-factor model did not fit for Hong Kong employees. The distributive-halo model was the most appropriate and showed that distributive justice impacted perceptions of both fairness outcomes and procedural justice. In addition, gender did not significantly impact outcomes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Cross Cultural Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
