Abstract

Although it is conventional wisdom that innovation requires free mind, diversity, or creativity all of which are closely associated with political and organizational decentralization, it is in fact more politically centralized countries in East Asia that successfully capitalized on innovation to catapult their economies onto the growth trajectory. Scholars have thus wondered if this is an exception rather a rule. Are more centralized countries innovative? Existing empirical research has produced mixed results. This study introduces a new perspective on this issue. Rather than the degree of centralization found in formal institutions, we focus on non-institutional or informal dimensions of centralization particularly associated with culture. Using Hofstede’s cross-national dataset capturing national culture, we explore how different dimensions of national culture are linked to national innovative capacity as proxied by patents. Our preliminary findings from the analysis of 34 OECD member states based on the patent data extracted from the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) database suggest that non-institutional dimensions of centralization account more for the variations in national rates of patents per capita than more formal aspects of centralization measured by traditional political datasets such as POLCON. While cultural aspects have been examined in technology management at the individual and the firm level, this study fills a gap in the existing literature by exploring their relationship at the national level. More research is clearly needed to explore the roles of non-institutional features facilitating or hampering innovation.

Highlights

  • Are politically decentralized countries more innovative? Since technological innovation prospers upon creativity, which in turn hinges on a free-thinking mind, one may well expect more democratic countries allowing greater individual freedom to provide a better institutional environment for technological innovation, as exemplified by Silicon Valley in the US, one of the most politically de-centralized countries

  • Our primary motivation for this study is to find out the cultural correlates of national innovative capacity given that the existing studies have largely looked into more formal, institutionalized features and conditions for technological innovation

  • Innovation prospers on free-thinking minds that are in turn more likely to bloom in societies allowing individual freedom

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Are politically decentralized countries more innovative? Since technological innovation prospers upon creativity, which in turn hinges on a free-thinking mind, one may well expect more democratic countries allowing greater individual freedom to provide a better institutional environment for technological innovation, as exemplified by Silicon Valley in the US, one of the most politically de-centralized countries. In a recent study, Taylor & Wilson (2012) have conducted a similar analysis to our own, examining the correlations between national culture and innovative capacity with Hofstede’s measures (House et al, 2004; Schwartz, 2006). It would be important and interesting to examine individualism but other dimensions of national culture captured in Hofstede’s measures, for these other dimensions may as well correlate with the tendencies for innovation.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call