Abstract

Hunter provides an analysis of contemporary group conflict in America that focuses on the presence of two distinct collective identities in political debate. For Hunter, Americans tend to cleave into two groups, especially at the extremes: the progressives and the orthodox. Progressives derive their sense of political authority from a vision of morality that is evolutionary, malleable, and subject to change as circumstances shift. There are few, if any, absolute standards of right and wrong; instead, social practices that made sense at one point in human history may be absurd at another. The traditional place of the woman in the home as child-rearer serves as a useful example of progressive thought: While this practice may once have made sense, contemporary circumstances make it possible for women to leave the home and enter the paid workforce as equal partners with men. Thus the traditional role for women represents a time-bound conception of “rightness”: It may have once made sense, but times change.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.