Abstract

In recent decades, researchers have increasingly documented the impact of anthropogenic activities on wild animals, particularly in relation to changes in behaviour. However, whether human-induced behavioural changes in wildlife may be considered evidence of cultural evolution remains an open question. We explored whether behavioural responses to different types of human activities in species already known to display behaviour transmitted through social learning, particularly non-human primates (NHPs), are suggestive of cultural evolution in the wild. Results indicate that human influence on NHP cultural repertoires includes the modification and disappearance of existing cultural traits, as well as the invention of novel traditions with the potential to become cultural. These examples are found mostly in the domain of food acquisition, where animals modify their diet to include new resources, and adopt novel foraging strategies to avoid humans. In summary, this paper suggests that human activities can act as a catalyst for cultural change in animals, both in terms of threatening existing traditions and fostering new ones. The current situation may echo environmental changes thought to have triggered major behavioural adaptations in our own evolutionary history and thus be useful for research on human cultural evolution. As wildlife is increasingly exposed to humans and their activities, understanding how animal behaviour patterns and cultures are impacted and change in response to anthropogenic factors is of growing conservation importance.

Highlights

  • There has been a recent surge of interest in studying the impact of human activities on wild animal populations

  • This paper investigates animal, in particular non-human primate (NHP), potentially cultural responses to human activities

  • We predict that the higher the impact of humans on a population’s habitat, the more existing behavioural traditions may be lost because of human pressure; but, concurrently, the higher this impact, the more behavioural adaptations unique to that population should be observed as a direct result of exposure to novel anthropogenic stimuli

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been a recent surge of interest in studying the impact of human activities on wild animal populations. This paper investigates animal, in particular non-human primate (NHP), potentially cultural responses to human activities (e.g., agriculture, hunting, road development) When these behavioural changes are deemed cultural (innovation is made by one or a limited number of individuals and is subsequently learned by others through social means (Fragaszy and Perry, 2003)), it suggests that humans can drive cultural change or cultural evolution (used synonymously; see below and Lamon et al, 2018; Mesoudi and Thornton, 2018) in other species. An example of direct avoidance of humans is the development of nocturnal cropforaging behaviour in one community of chimpanzees at Sebitoli in Uganda (Krief et al, 2014) Such behavioural responses, far from being isolated (see review in McLennan et al, 2017 and Table 1), suggest that novel behaviours in wild NHPs and other species may enter their behavioural repertoire as a result of human activities. Visitor (e.g., fishermen) leaving raw fish to Consumption of raw fish (I) dry or providing on Koshima island

Introduction of oil palm trees
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call