Abstract
In the UK, attempts since the 1970s to control the incidence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle by culling a wildlife host, the European badger (Meles meles), have produced equivocal results. Culling-induced social perturbation of badger populations may lead to unexpected outcomes. We test predictions from the ‘perturbation hypothesis’, determining the impact of culling operations on badger populations, movement of surviving individuals and the influence on the epidemiology of bTB in badgers using data dervied from two study areas within the UK Government's Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT). Culling operations did not remove all individuals from setts, with between 34–43% of badgers removed from targeted social groups. After culling, bTB prevalence increased in badger social groups neighbouring removals, particularly amongst cubs. Seventy individual adult badgers were fitted with radio-collars, yielding 8,311 locational fixes from both sites between November 2001 and December 2003. Home range areas of animals surviving within removed groups increased by 43.5% in response to culling. Overlap between summer ranges of individuals from Neighbouring social groups in the treatment population increased by 73.3% in response to culling. The movement rate of individuals between social groups was low, but increased after culling, in Removed and Neighbouring social groups. Increased bTB prevalence in Neighbouring groups was associated with badger movements both into and out of these groups, although none of the moving individuals themselves tested positive for bTB. Significant increases in both the frequency of individual badger movements between groups and the emergence of bTB were observed in response to culling. However, no direct evidence was found to link the two phenomena. We hypothesise that the social disruption caused by culling may not only increase direct contact and thus disease transmission between surviving badgers, but may also increase social stress within the surviving population, causing immunosuppression and enhancing the expression of disease.
Highlights
Attempts to manage infectious diseases in wildlife populations have varying consequences for the ecology of the target populations, depending on the methods used [1,2]
Epidemiological patterns of directly transmitted infectious diseases are the product of contacts between individuals that permit disease transmission [8], and heterogeneous mixing of individuals is of particular importance [9]
We report here on a field experiment carried out within the Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT) Triplet E designed to examine perturbation effects following culling within the RBCT reactive strategy
Summary
Attempts to manage infectious diseases in wildlife populations have varying consequences for the ecology of the target populations, depending on the methods used [1,2]. Management interventions to control infectious disease in wildlife populations may themselves influence individual behaviours, such as dispersal, which may in turn result in counter-productive outcomes such as further disease spread [5,7,10]. Predicting such outcomes in wild animal populations is enormously challenging, not least because the behavioural processes underlying disease transmission are notoriously difficult to study [11]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
