Abstract

The optimization of one-phase dimensional synthesis problems for path-generating four-bar mechanisms is a difficult task. Such problems have mainly been solved in the literature using the differential evolution (DE) algorithm and its variants, such as a combined-mutation DE (CMDE). The shortcoming of using DE or its variants lies in the time-consuming parameter tuning that can take up to a dozen iterations. In this study, two well-known population-based metaheuristic optimization methods, i.e. the cuckoo search (CS) and teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithms are employed to solve five representative problems. Only one user-supplied parameter is needed for CS and none for TLBO. Findings show that the solution accuracy of CS is superior to that of DE and TLBO. Moreover, CS, with its advantage of parameter tuning only four times, rivals CMDE in solution accuracy. The reason for the superior exploitation capability of CS lies in the special combination of two search modes, i.e. the Lévy flight with respect to the best individual and the random walk. To bring the performance of TLBO into full play, the number of function evaluations is two times the original one. However, TLBO still fails to provide much more accurate solutions for the first two problems.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.