Abstract
Bloom filters are used to perform approximate membership checking in a wide range of applications in both computing and networking, but the recently introduced cuckoo filter is also gaining popularity. Therefore, it is of interest to compare both filters and provide insights into their features so that designers can make an informed decision when implementing approximate membership checking in a given application. This article first compares Bloom and cuckoo filters focusing on a packet classification application. The analysis identifies a shortcoming of cuckoo filters in terms of false positive rate when they do not operate close to full occupancy. Based on that observation, this article also proposes the use of a configurable bucket to improve the scaling of the false positive rate of the cuckoo filter with occupancy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
