Cubital tunnel perfusion in different postures-An anatomical investigation.

Abstract

Introduction/AimsFor cubital tunnel syndrome, the avoidance of predisposing arm positions and the use of elbow splints are common conservative treatment options. The rationale is to prevent excessive stretching and compression of the nerve in the cubital tunnel, as this mechanical stress impedes intraneural perfusion. Data regarding those upper extremity postures to avoid, or whether elbow flexion alone is detrimental, are inconsistent. This study aimed to assess perfusion and size changes of the cubital tunnel during different postures in an experimental cadaver setup.MethodsAxillary arteries in 30 upper extremities of fresh cadavers were injected with ultrasound contrast agent. High‐resolution ultrasound of the cubital tunnel was performed during five different arm postures that gradually increased tension on the ulnar nerve and caused cubital tunnel narrowing. Contrast enhancement within the tunnel was measured to quantify perfusion. Cubital tunnel cross‐sectional area was measured to detect compression.ResultsIncreasing tension significantly reduced perfusion. When isolated, neither shoulder elevation, elbow flexion, pronation, nor extension of wrist and fingers impaired perfusion. However, combining two or more of these postures led to significant decreases. Significant narrowing of the cubital tunnel was seen in full elbow flexion and shoulder elevation.DiscussionCombinations of some upper extremity joint positions reduce nerve perfusion, but isolated elbow flexion does not have a significant impact. We hypothesize that elbow splints alone may not influence cubital tunnel perfusion but may only prevent direct compression of the ulnar nerve. Advising patients about upper extremity postures that should be avoided may be more effective.