Abstract

Reviewed by: Cuba, the United States, and Cultures of the Transnational Left, 1930–1975 by John A. Gronbeck-Tedesco Michelle Chase John A. Gronbeck-Tedesco. Cuba, the United States, and Cultures of the Transnational Left, 1930–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. 307 pp. The past few years seem to have inaugurated a transnational turn in the growing scholarship on Cuba's 1959 revolution.1 John Gronbeck-Tedesco's Cuba, the United States, and Cultures of the Transnational Left is a welcome addition to this trend. In this sweeping exploration of US-Cuban cultural and political relations, Gronbeck-Tedesco describes a shared long-term dialogue, "a larger transnational space of Left culture," constructed between Cuban and US activists (45). Yet this is not necessarily a story of unity. Gronbeck-Tedesco is sensitive to aspects of disagreement or mutual incomprehension—what he calls "gaps in the transnation" (68)—that make this a story of conflict as well as solidarity. Eschewing a teleological tendency to see 1933 as "prelude" to the 1959 revolution, Gronbeck-Tedesco argues instead for conceptualizing the "Cuban revolutions as a historical period—bridging what is usually historicized separately as the 'thirties' and the 'sixties'" (4). This broader historical scale captures intriguing continuities and parallels. Organized chronologically and thematically, the book moves from the internationalism of the old left and popular front to the rise of the new left and "tricontinentalism." Along the way we meet activists, writers, and intellectuals representative of the Generación del 30, afrocubanismo, the Harlem Renaissance, the black power movement, first- and second-wave feminism, and the US "third world left." Throughout, the book pays significant attention to race and gender, two areas where we find perhaps the greatest "gaps" between island and mainland activists. Some of the material covered here may feel familiar, as Gronbeck-Tedesco is building on work by Van Gosse, Frank Guridy, Mark O. Sawyer, and others. But the book's ambitious scope, long historical period, and careful research provide new insights. The chapters on the 1930s are particularly enlightening, adding significantly to the perennially underdeveloped historiography on the 1933 revolution. Here Gronbeck-Tedesco usefully reconstructs the enormous impact that 1933 made on progressives in the United States and beyond. Cuba's 1933 revolution, he shows, became a touchstone in left-wing literature alongside other global conflagrations such as the Spanish Civil War, the Scottsboro case, and [End Page 357] the peasant rebellion in China. Carlton Beals's widely read work The Crime of Cuba (1933) was particularly influential in this regard. In a thoughtful analysis of the book's text and photos, Gronbeck-Tedesco shows how Beals launched a powerful denunciation of Machado while also mobilizing certain condescending constructions of Cuban exoticism and racial difference that echoed tropes from tourist literature and social science. Thus the US left reproduced neocolonial language while professing authentically felt solidarity—an observation equally applicable to the 1960s and beyond. In other ways, too, it is striking how trends we often associate with the 1960s were anticipated in the 1930s. The author shows that, already in the 1930s, Cuba provided an idealized trope of agrarian revolution and mass uprising. Here he carefully reconstructs the way Pablo de la Torriente Brau's 1934 exposé of the agrarian conflict in Realengo 18 entered wider transnational circulation when the US journalist Josephine Herbst published a similar series of articles in New Masses one year later in which she positioned Realengo 18 as "a kind of agrarian vanguard, believing that she [had] discovered in the Cuban hinterland seeds for revolution" (66). Cuba's 1933 revolution seemed to provide an appealing alternative to the Soviet Union, then beset by bureaucracy, political purges, executions, and famine, just as the 1959 revolution initially raised hopes for a "humanist" revolution that might forge a third way in the polarized Cold War world. After 1959, it proves somewhat harder to flesh out individual Cuban cultural figures of the period, as Gronbeck-Tedesco does so well for writers and intellectuals of the 1930s such as de la Torriente Brau, Nicolás Guillén, Mariblanca Sabas Alomá, and Regino Pedroso. In these sections the book largely provides insight into the way US activists or organizations...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call