CTIM-23. SAFETY RUN-IN RESULTS OF A PHASE I/II STUDY TO EVALUATE ATEZOLIZUMAB IN COMBINATION WITH CABOZANTINIB IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has shown limited efficacy in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) in both newly diagnosed and recurrent disease which underscores the need for rational combinatorial strategies. Atezolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets PD-L1 and has been shown to enhance the magnitude of tumor-specific T cell responses. Combining PD-L1/PD-1 axis inhibition with targeted therapy like cabozantinib which has both anti-tumoral and immunomodulatory properties may result in synergistic effects. Cabozantinib may modulate the myeloid cell population to overcome resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. METHODS Eligibility criteria were those with recurrent GBM, age >18 yrs with 1st or 2nd recurrence who were naïve to antiangiogenic and receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. The primary objective of the phase I run-in was to evaluate the safety of atezolizumab in combination with cabozantinib. RESULTS 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of a grade 3 ALT elevation was observed in the first 6 DLT evaluable patients treated during the safety run-in phase. Regarding immune related adverse events, 1 of 6 patients developed atezolizumab-related grade 1 hypothyroidism. 1 of 6 patients developed study treatment-related grade 2 diarrhea. 2 patients after completion of 2 cycles of treatment had evidence of a partial radiographic response ( > 50% decrease). 1 patient had a near partial radiographic response (45% decrease). 2 patients had stable disease after completion of 2 cycles of the combinatorial treatment. 1 patient had only completed the first 28-day cycle, DLT period, and had not yet had imaging to reassess disease status. CONCLUSIONS The combination of atezolizumab with cabozantinib was tolerable, and no new safety signals were noted. In this small cohort of recurrent GBM patients, radiographic responses were observed. The phase II component of the trial is recruiting patients (n = 45) to evaluate clinical efficacy. Multi-omic correlative studies and fecal microbiome analyses are planned.