CT-Guided Percutaneous Drainage Catheter Placement in the Abdomen and Pelvis: Predictors of Outcome and Protocol for Follow-up

Abstract

PurposeTo determine predictors of outcomes for patients who undergo computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous abdominal or pelvic drainage catheter placement and to identify which patients benefit from fluoroscopic drainage catheter interrogation (abscessogram). Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of 383 patients (mean, 52 years old; range 8–89 years old; 158 males: 225 females) who underwent 442 CT-guided procedures and 489 catheter placements for fluid collections in the abdomen or pelvis from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016 was performed. Variables including underlying disease, fluid location, number of collections drained, number of catheter exchanges and follow-up abscessograms performed, catheter size, and fistula detection were analyzed to determine factors associated with fistula formation and increased catheter dwell time. ResultsA single abscessogram followed by catheter removal was performed for 217 catheters (44%). An increased number of abscessograms was significantly associated with drainage catheter size (P < .001) and presence of a fistula (P < .001). Fistulae were detected in 95 cases (19%) and were significantly associated with an increased number of drain exchanges (P < .001) and an underlying diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (P = .02). Based on these data, a clinical algorithm for drain management is presented. ConclusionsAbscessograms performed after CT-guided percutaneous drainage catheter placement are useful to detect catheter malposition, occluded catheters, and fistulae but are not necessary for all patients. If performed selectively, particularly in patients with an underlying diagnosis of Crohn’s disease or those at high risk for developing fistulae, unnecessary examinations can be avoided, reducing cost, extra hospital visits, and radiation dose.