Abstract
Background: Differentiation of embolic and atherosclerotic occlusions is difficult prior to endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial large artery occlusions. CTA-determined occlusion type has been reported to be associated with a negative cardiac embolic source and stent retriever failure, a potential of intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS)-related occlusions. In this study, we evaluated the agreement between preprocedural identification of CTA-determined truncal-type occlusion (TTO) and postprocedural evaluation of underlying fixed focal stenosis (FFS) in the occlusion site.Methods: Patients who underwent intracranial EVT for acute ischemic stroke within 24 h of onset and who had baseline CTA were identified from a multicenter registry collected between January 2011 and May 2016. Preprocedural occlusion type was classified as TTO (target artery bifurcation saved) or branching-site occlusion (bifurcation involved) on CTA. As for postprocedural identification, FFS was evaluated by stepwise analyses of procedural and postprocedural angiographies. The agreement between TTO and FFS was evaluated in respective intracranial vascular beds. Receiver operating characteristics analyses were also performed.Results: A total of 509 patients were included [intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA): 193, middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1: 256, and vertebrobasilar artery (VBA): 60]. In preprocedural identification, 33 (17.1%), 41 (16.0%), and 29 patients (48.3%) had TTOs, respectively. TTOs had good agreement with angiographic FFS in M1 (positive predictive value: 63.4%, negative predictive value: 83.2%, likelihood ratio: 5.42, Pmultivariate < 0.001) and VBA (72.4%, 96.8%, and 4.54, respectively, Pmultivariate = 0.004), but not in intracranial ICA occlusions (Pmultivariate = 0.358). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was the largest for VBA (0.872, p < 0.001), followed by MCA M1 (0.671, p < 0.001), and intracranial ICA (0.551, p = 0.465).Conclusions: Agreement between preprocedural TTO and postprocedural FFS, both of which are surrogate markers for ICAS-related occlusions, is highest for VBA, followed by MCA M1 occlusions. There is no significant association in intracranial ICA.
Highlights
The recent success of several randomized controlled trials of endovascular treatment (EVT) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] has resulted in adoption of EVT as standard therapy for acute stroke due to intracranial large artery occlusion
Because intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS)-related occlusion cannot be differentiated by baseline imaging prior to the procedure, the effectiveness of EVT is difficult to confirm in a randomized prospective trial
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the agreement between the truncal-type occlusion (TTO), a preprocedural occlusion type, and the fixed focal stenosis (FFS), a postprocedural surrogate marker of ICAS-related occlusion, in the three most common occlusion sites targeted by EVT, including the intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA), the middle cerebral artery M1 portion (MCA M1), and the vertebrobasilar artery (VBA), using a retrospective multicenter EVT database
Summary
The recent success of several randomized controlled trials of endovascular treatment (EVT) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] has resulted in adoption of EVT as standard therapy for acute stroke due to intracranial large artery occlusion. Two surrogate markers for ICAS-related occlusion have been reported: fixed focal stenosis (FFS) and truncal-type occlusion (TTO). Differentiation of embolic and atherosclerotic occlusions is difficult prior to endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial large artery occlusions. We evaluated the agreement between preprocedural identification of CTA-determined truncal-type occlusion (TTO) and postprocedural evaluation of underlying fixed focal stenosis (FFS) in the occlusion site
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.