CT volumetry performs better than nuclear renography in predicting estimated renal function one year after living donation

Abstract

The evaluation of split renal function (SRF) is a critical issue in living kidney donations and can be evaluated using nuclear renography (NR) or computerized tomography (CT), with unclear comparative advantages. We conducted this retrospective study in 193 donors to examine the correlation of SRF assessed by NR and CT volumetry and compared their ability to predict remaining donor renal function at 1 year, through multiple approaches. A weak correlation between imaging techniques for evaluating the percentage of the remaining kidney volume was found in the global cohort, with an R2 = 0.15. However, the Bland–Altman plot showed an acceptable agreement (95% of the difference between techniques falling within − 8.51 to 6.11%). The predicted and observed eGFR one year after donation were calculated using the CKD-EPI, and CG/BSA equations. CT volume showed a better correlation than NR for both formulas (adjusted R2 of 0.42. and 0.61 vs 0.37 and 0.61 for CKD-EPI and CG/ BSA equations, respectively). In non-nested modeling tests, CT volumetry was significantly superior to NR for both equations. CT volumetry performed better than NR in predicting the estimated renal function of living donors at 1-year, independently from the eGFR equation.