Abstract
ObjectivesRotational malalignment of knee replacements as measured on CT is understood to be associated with poor outcomes. The aim of this study is to measure the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of measures of femoral and tibial version in the native arthritic knee and postoperative TKR component position using CT.MethodsEighty patients underwent CT of the knee before and after total knee replacement. Preoperative femoral and tibial version and component rotation were independently measured by two musculoskeletal radiologists.ResultsMean differences between and within raters were small (< 1.6°). Maximum 95% limits of agreement for inter-rater and intra-rater comparisons were 8.1° and 7.6° for preoperative femoral version, 9.0° and 7.9° for postoperative femoral rotation, 26.0° and 20.5° for preoperative tibial version, and 24.9° and 23.6° for postoperative tibial rotation respectively. Postoperative ICCs varied from 0.68 to 0.81 (lower 95% CI:0.55–0.72) for both intra- and inter-rater comparisons. Preoperative ICCs were lower: 0.55–0.75 (lower 95% CI:0.40–0.65).ConclusionThe lower 95% confidence level for ICC of version and rotational measurements using the Berger protocol of TKRs on CT are all less than 0.73 and that the normal range of differences between observers is up to 9° for the femoral component and 26° for the tibial component. This suggests that CT measurements derived from the Berger protocol may not be consistent enough for clinical practice.Key Points• CT is commonly used to measure the rotational profile of knee replacements in symptomatic patients using the Berger protocol.• The limits of agreement for both femoral and tibial component rotation are wide even for experienced observers.• CT measurements of the rotation of knee arthroplasty are not reliable enough for routine clinical use.
Highlights
Up to 20% of patients have continued pain or report dissatisfaction after primary total knee replacement (TKR) [1, 2]
This study presents the results of two different statistical approaches to assessing inter-rater reliability for computed tomography (CT) measurements of rotation in the pre- and post-operative knee
While Bland–Altman plots are arguably a better method for measuring the reproducibility of a test compared to intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) [21], they have not been previously applied to rotational measurements of ICC
Summary
Up to 20% of patients have continued pain or report dissatisfaction after primary total knee replacement (TKR) [1, 2]. Malrotation of either the femoral or tibial components is one possible cause of this dissatisfaction [3]. Problems that have been associated with malrotation of the components are patella maltracking [4, 5], anterior knee pain [6], accelerated wear of the polyethylene liner [7], limitations. The rotational position of the femoral and tibial components is most commonly assessed with computed tomography (CT). While there are a number of methods for analysing the component rotation, the Berger protocol is the most widely used [11,12,13,14,15]. The Berger protocol has been reported to have good inter-rater and intra-rater reliability by some authors [11, 16, 17] but others disagree arguing that the inter-rater reliability is unsatisfactory [18]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
