CT guided versus non-image guided bone marrow aspiration and biopsy: Comparison of indications, specimen quality and cost

Abstract

PurposeTo compare the indications, specimen quality, and cost of CT versus non-image guided bone marrow aspirate and biopsy (BMAB). MethodsAll CT and non-image guided BMAB performed from January 2013–July 2022 were studied. Body-mass-index (BMI), skin-to-bone distance, aspirate, and core specimen quality, and core sample length were documented. Indications for CT guided BMAB were recorded. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared test and continuous variables using Mann-Whitney test. Analysis of per-biopsy factors used linear mixed-effect models to adjust for clustering. Cost of CT and non-image guided BMAB was taken from patient billing data. ResultsThere were 301 CT and 6535 non-image guided BMABs studied. All CT guided BMAB were studied. A subset of 317 non-image guided BMAB was selected randomly from the top ten CT BMAB referrers. BMI (kg/m2) and skin-to-bone distance (cm) was higher in the CT versus the non-image guided group; 34.4 v 26.8, p < 0.0001; 4.8 v 2.5, p < 0.0001, respectively. Aspirate and core sample quality were not different between groups, p = 0.21 and p = 0.12, respectively. CT guided core marrow samples were longer, p < 0.0001. The most common CT BMAB referral indications were large body habitus (47.7 %), failed attempt (18.8 %) and not stated (17.4 %). Cost of a CT guided BMAB with conscious sedation was $3945 USD versus $310 USD for non-image guided. ConclusionCT guided BMAB are commonly performed in patients with large body habitus and failed attempt. However, the cost is 12.7 fold higher with no increase in specimen quality. These findings can help referrers be cost conscious.