Abstract

Objectives The intraoperative frozen section examination (IFSE) of pulmonary ground-glass density nodules (GGNs) is a great challenge. In the present study, through comparing the correlation between the computed tomography (CT) findings and pathological diagnosis of GGNs, the CT features as independent risk factors affecting the examination were defined, and their value in the rapid intraoperative examination of GGNs was explored. Methods The relevant clinical data of 90 patients with GGNs on CT were collected, and all CT findings of GGNs, including the maximum transverse diameter, average CT value, spiculation, solid component, vascular sign, air sign, bronchus sign, lobulation, and pleural indentation, were recorded. All the cases received thoracoscopic surgery, and final pathological results were obtained. The cases were divided into three groups on the basis of pathological diagnosis: benign/atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)/microinvasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). The CT findings were analyzed statistically, the independent risk factors were identified through the intergroup bivariate logistic regression analysis on variables with statistically significant differences, and a receiver operating curve (ROC) was plotted to establish a logistic regression model for diagnosing GGNs. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the coincidence rate of the rapid intraoperative and routine postoperative pathological examinations of the 90 cases with GGNs. The relevant clinical data of 49 cases with GGNs were collected. Conventional rapid intraoperative examination and CT-assisted rapid intraoperative examination were performed, and their coincidence rates with routine postoperative pathological examinations were compared. Results No statistical differences in the onset age, gender, smoking history, and family history of malignant tumors were found among cases with GGNs in the identification of benign/AAH, AIS/MIA, and IAC (P = 0.158, P = 0.947, P = 0.746, P = 0.566). No statistically significant difference was found among the three groups in terms of CT findings, such as lobulation, bronchus sign, pleural indentation, spiculation, vascular sign, and solid component (P > 0.05). The air sign, the maximum transverse diameter of GGNs, and average CT value showed statistically significant differences among the groups (P < 0.001, P < 0.05, P < 0.001). Bivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on three risk factors, and the predicted probability value was obtained. A ROC curve was plotted by using the maximum transverse diameter as a predictor for analysis between the groups with benign/AAH and AIS/MIA, and the results demonstrated that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.692. A ROC curve was plotted by using the predicted probability value, maximum transverse diameter, and average CT value as predictors for distinguishing between the groups with AIS/MIA and IAC, and the results showed that the AUC values of the predicted probability value, maximum transverse diameter, and CT value were 0.920, 0.816, and 0.772, respectively. A regression model [Logit (P) = 2.304 − 2.689X1 + 0.302X2 + 0.011X3] was established to identify GGNs as IAC, obtaining AUC values of up to 0.920 for the groups with AIS/MIA and IAC, the sensitivity of 0.821, and the specificity of 0.894. The coincidence rate of rapid intraoperative and routine postoperative pathological examinations taken for modeling was 79.3%, that of conventional IFSE and postoperative pathological examination in prospective studies was 83.7%, and that of CT-assisted rapid intraoperative and postoperative pathological examinations was 98.0%. The former two were statistically different from the last one (P = 0.003 and P = 0.031, respectively). Conclusion The air sign, maximum transverse diameter, and average CT value of the CT findings of GGNs had superior capabilities to enhance the pathologic classification of GGNs. The auxiliary function of the comprehensive multifactor analysis of GGNs was better than that of single-factor analysis. CT-assisted diagnosis can improve the accuracy of rapid intraoperative examination, thereby increasing the accuracy of the selection of operative approaches in clinical practice.

Highlights

  • A ground-glass density nodule (GGN) manifests on computed tomography (CT) as a small region of pulmonary nodule with enhanced turbidity [1] and pathologically as an active inflammatory process or benign or malignant tumors [2]

  • The results revealed that when the receiver operating curve (ROC) curve was plotted with the maximum transverse diameter as the test variable, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.816, the sensitivity was 0.786, the specificity was 0.613, and the Youden index was 0.531, indicating that the maximum transverse diameter of 13.5 mm was of good predictive significance for distinguishing between the groups with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)/microinvasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC)

  • intraoperative frozen section examination (IFSE) is pathologically limited by time and the number of specimens, and the diagnostic accuracy rate of this examination is often lower than that of routine postoperative pathological examinations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A ground-glass density nodule (GGN) manifests on computed tomography (CT) as a small region of pulmonary nodule with enhanced turbidity [1] and pathologically as an active inflammatory process or benign or malignant tumors [2]. With the popularity of low-dose CT, the detection rate of ground-glass lung nodules (GGNs) has increased annually, and a growing number of cases with early lung cancer have been screened out. Surgical treatment has been always the most effective for lung cancer at the early stage. As a result of the two concepts of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)/microinvasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), as well as the technological advances in thoracoscopic surgery, the sublobectomy, including wedge resection and pulmonary segmentectomy, has a significant benefit in the treatment of early lung cancer [4]. For GGNs, the differential diagnosis among atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), AIS, and MIA is dauntingly difficult, to identify whether there is invasion and the degree of invasion in the context of inflammation and fibrosis, to distinguish collapsed alveoli form adenoid structures against the backdrop of alveolar collapse, and to accurately distinguish true and false papillary structures are the key points in the diagnosis of GGNs of the lung and a difficult problem for clinic pathologists

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call