Abstract

ISHs and ICHs from ruptured MCA aneurysms can be difficult to distinguish on NCE-CT but may have a different impact on admission status and outcome. The presence of IHCEV on CTA may differentiate ISHs and ICHs. Two observers independently reviewed non-contrast-enhanced CT scans and CTAs of 71 patients with MCA aneurysm hematomas for the site of the hematoma, according to predefined characteristics, and for the presence of IHCEV. We compared CTAs with NCE-CT scans in which both observers were confident about hematoma localization. We calculated κ statistics for interobserver agreement, and RRs for poor clinical condition and poor outcome. Agreement for IHCEV was almost perfect (κ, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.74-0.99). After consensus reading, 30 of 71 patients had IHCEV. In 28 of the 71 NCE-CT scans, both observers were confident as to the the site of the hematoma (κ, 0.55; 95% CI, 37%-73%). IHCEV were present in 10 of these 28 patients, of whom 9 had an ISH based on NCE-CT (positive predictive value, 90%; 95% CI, 55%-100%). In all 18 of 28 patients without IHCEV, the hematoma was not intra-Sylvian (negative predictive value, 100%; 95% CI, 82%-100%). Poor admission status occurred in 50% of patients with IHCEV and in 60% without IHCEV (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-1.9). Poor outcome occurred in 63% of patients with IHCEV and in 65% without IHCEV (RR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7-1.5). Although CTA could reliably and accurately differentiate the hematoma types, admission status and outcome were similar for both groups.

Highlights

  • AND PURPOSE: ISHs and ICHs from ruptured MCA aneurysms can be difficult to distinguish on NCE-CT but may have a different impact on admission status and outcome

  • IHCEV were present in 10 of these 28 patients, of whom 9 had an ISH based on NCE-CT

  • Poor admission status occurred in 50% of patients with IHCEV and in 60% without IHCEV (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 –1.9)

Read more

Summary

Objectives

The purpose of our study was to assess the diagnostic characteristics of IHCEV on CTA and to assess the relation between the presence of IHCEV and the patients’ clinical condition and functional outcome

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.