CT- and MR-based image-based data mining are consistent in the brain

Abstract

PurposeImage-based data mining (IBDM) is a voxel-based analysis technique to investigate dose–response. Most often, IBDM uses radiotherapy planning CTs because of their broad accessibility, however, it was unknown whether CT provided sufficient soft tissue contrast for brain IBDM. This study evaluates whether MR-based IBDM improves upon CT-based IBDM for studies of children with brain tumours. MethodsWe compared IBDM pipelines using either CT- or MRI-based spatial normalisation in 128 children (ages 3.3–19.7 years) who received photon radiotherapy for primary brain tumours at a single institution. We quantified spatial-normalisation accuracy using contour comparison measures (centre-of-mass separation, average contour distance-to-agreement (DTavg), and Hausdorff distance) at multiple anatomic loci. We performed an end-to-end test of CT- and MRI-IBDM using modified clinical dose distributions and simulated effect labels to detect associations in pre-defined anatomic loci. Accuracy was assessed via sensitivity and specificity. ResultsSpatial normalisation accuracy was comparable for both modalities, with a significant but small improvement for MRI compared to CT in all structures except the brainstem. The median (range) difference between the DTavg for the two pipelines was 0.37 (0.00–2.91) mm. The end-to-end test revealed no significant difference in sensitivity of the IBDM-identified regions for the two pipelines. Specificity slightly improved for MR-IBDM at the 99% significance level. ConclusionCT-based IBDM was comparable to MR-based IBDM, despite a small advantage in spatial normalisation accuracy with MRI. The use of CT-IBDM over MR-IBDM is useful for multi-institutional retrospective IBDM studies, where the availability of standardised MRI data can be limited.