Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe aim of this work was to compare the different techniques and the different fluid permeability of the tissue following each technique through assessing the flow of radiopaque contrast agent using μCT image analysis and 3D modelling.MethodsDonated human tali specimens (n=12) were prepared through creating a 10mm diameter chondral defect in three different regions of each talus. Each region then underwent one of three surgical techniques: 1) Fine wire drilling, 2) Nanofracture or 3) Microfracture, equidistant sites in each defect to ensure even distribution. Each region then had an addition of 0.1 ml radiopaque contrast agent (Omnipaque™ 300), imaged using a clinical μCT scanner (SCANCO Medical AG, 73.6 μm resolution). Each μCT scan was segmented using Slicer 3D software (The Slicer Community, 2023 3D Slicer (5.2.2)). The segmentation package was used to segment the bone and contrast agent regions in each different surgical site of each sample. Each defect site was created into a cylinder and the ratio of segmented pixels of contrast agent against bone.ResultsThe μCT analysis indicated that across the 12 samples, eight nanofracture regions demonstrated flow of the contrast agent either to the depth of the fracture site or deeper. Some lateral flow was also observed in these sites. eight microfracture regions demonstrated that the flow of the contrast agent was localised to the fracture site and a preferential flow laterally. In only one sample, did a fine wire drilling region demonstrate any fluid flow. In this sample, contrast agent had permeated through the drilling site to the bottom and some sub-site permeation was observed. However, in all samples that showed no permeation of contrast agent through the fracture site, a layer of contrast agent on the chondral surface or minor permeation through to the sub-chondral surface. Segmentation of each sample site showed a significant increase (n=12, p<0.05) in fluid flow of the contrast agent in the nanofracture sites (11%) compared to microfracture (5%) and fine wire drilling (2%).ConclusionsNanofracture showed significantly improved fluid permeability throughout the surrounding trabecular structure, when compared to microfracture and fine wire drilling. Microfracture appears to allow some fluid flow, but only confined to the immediate area around the fracture site, while fine wire drilling appears to allow a comparably small amount, if not no fluid flow through the surrounding trabecular tissue. This conclusion is reinforced by previous literature that concluded the damage to the structure of the trabecular tissue is reduced when using nanofracture, compared to the other two techniques.Declaration of Interest(a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call