Abstract

The paper empirically explores how firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure varies according to their ownership structure. Three different kinds of ownership structures are considered: family firms (FFs), state-owned firms (SOFs) and firms with dispersed ownership (DOFs). It is the first study examining the relationship between CSR disclosure and ownership structure, which includes in the analysis also FFs and SOFs. The analysis is provided on a sample of 192 listed firms with reference to Italy, a suitable setting for the purpose of the study due to the considerable presence of both FFs and SOFs. Firstly, a content analysis on the CSR documents disclosed by the 192 firms is provided and then data are empirically analysed to test whether the ownership structure influences a firm’s CSR disclosure. Results show that FFs and SOFs disclose less CSR information and the explanation can be found in the lower level of agency problems they have to face. The paper contributes to the stream of literature about CSR disclosure, because it argues that the contents of CSR disclosure vary according to firm’s ownership structure and also to those about FFs and SOFs because it shows that the presence of a concentrated ownership lowers the level of CSR information disclosed.

Highlights

  • Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure can be defined as the process by which firms disseminate information about their social, environmental, ethical and human activities that are not related to their financial performance (Gray, Javad, Power, & Sinclair, 2001; Campbell, 2006; Hackston & Milne, 1996; McMurtrie, 2005; Golob & Barlett, 2007)

  • We focus our attention on the Italian context, which seems to be a suitable setting for our purpose because the presence of both family firms (FFs) and state-owned firms (SOFs) is relevant (Corbetta & Montemerlo, 1999; Trento & Giacomelli, 2004; Secchi, 2005; Caselli & Di Giuli, 2010; Campopiano & De Massis, 2015)

  • First of all this research contributes to the extant literature about CSR disclosure because we argue that firms are not equal in their approach to CSR disclosure, but that the contents of CSR disclosure vary from firm to firm according to different ownership structures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

CSR disclosure can be defined as the process by which firms disseminate information about their social, environmental, ethical and human activities that are not related to their financial performance (Gray, Javad, Power, & Sinclair, 2001; Campbell, 2006; Hackston & Milne, 1996; McMurtrie, 2005; Golob & Barlett, 2007). Previous literature shows that the extent and content of CSR disclosure vary from firm to firm and for this reason the topic has been analyzed under different points of view: in relation to the performance of the firm (Cochran & Wood, 1984; McGuire, Sundgren, & Schneeweis, 1988; Belkaoui & Karpik, 1989; Aras et al, 2010; Ismail & Chandler, 2005), to its dimension (Jenkins & Yakovleva, 2006; Hossain & Reaz, 2007), and to the kind of firms stakeholders (Roberts, 1992; Sweeney, & Coughlan, 2008; Dawkins & Ngunjiri, 2008; Ali, Frynas, & Mahmood, 2017; Al-Bassam, Ntim, Opong, & Downs, 2018; Ntim, Soobaroyen, & Broad, 2017) Another important dimension affecting the CSR disclosure is represented by the ownership structure (Secchi, 2005; Tagesson et al, 2009; Campopiano, De Massis, & Cassia, 2012). It is striking to note that very few previous studies have analyzed how different kinds of ownership structure affect the process of CSR disclosure (Secchi, 2005; Frost & Seamer, 2004; Campopiano et al, 2012)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.