Abstract
AbstractThree types of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) were investigated: linear (unprocessed) bottle‐grade PET (intrinsic viscosity, IV ∼ 0.82 dL g−1); a branched PET produced from linear PET by reactive extrusion with 0.4% w/w pyromellitic dianhydride and pentaerythritol in 5:1 molar ratio (IV ∼ 0.97 dL g−1); and a control sample produced from the same linear PET by extrusion under the same conditions without the reactive agents (IV ∼ 0.71 dL g−1). A key finding is that the reactive extrusion process, presumably as a consequence of branching and branch distribution, significantly modifies the crystallisation kinetics and changes the final morphology. Using small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), the crystallisation kinetics of PET was monitored from the melt (270 °C) to a crystallisation temperature of either 205 or 210 °C. The IV of the branched PET was ∼ 21% greater than that of the unprocessed PET, and the rate of melt crystallisation (from DSC measurements) was 510 s for the branched, 528 s for the control, and 640 s for the unprocessed PET. The lamellae spacings measured from the equilibrium SAXS patterns were ∼160 ± 10 Å for the branched PET and ∼180 ± 10 Å for the unprocessed PET. Such properties offer the potential for new applications requiring high‐melt‐strength PET. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.