Abstract

[Ru(TPP)(CS)(EtOH)] crystallizes in the triclinic system. Crystal data: C47H34N4ORuS, M r = 803.91, a = 10.607 (3), b = 11.308 (5), c = 17.699 (2) Å, \alpha = 77.53 (2), \beta = 73.17 (1), \gamma = 69.85 (3)°, V = 1891.6 (10) Å3, P\overline 1 (C^{1}_{i}, no. 2), Z = 2, F(000) = 824, D x = 1.410, D m = 1.39 Mg m−3 (by flotation in aqueous KI), \mu(Mo K\alpha) = 0.512 mm−1, R = 0.094, wR = 0.098, S = 2.28 for 4610 independent reflections with F o > 5\sigma(F o ). A second data set was collected using Cu K\alpha radiation. The structure was refined by standard least-squares and difference-Fourier methods in space groups P1 and P\overline 1 using both the Mo K\alpha and Cu K\alpha data sets. Both data sets favor space group P\overline 1, the Mo data giving a slightly better result than the Cu data. The two independent Ru atoms lie on the inversion centers ½,0,0 and ½,½,½ of space group P\overline 1. Consequently, the two independent molecules have crystallographically imposed \overline 1 symmetry, the CS and EtOH axial groups are disordered and the RuN4 portions of the molecules are planar. The deviations from planarity of the porphyrinato core are very small. The Ru—C—S groups are essentially linear with an average Ru—C—S bond angle of 174 (1)°. The mean Ru—C(CS) and Ru—O (Et) bond lengths are 1.92 (4) and 2.15 (3) Å, respectively.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.