Abstract

As with most disciplines in biology, molecular genetics has revolutionized our understanding of lichenized fungi. Nowhere has this been more true than in systematics, especially in the delimitation of species. In many cases, molecular research has verified long-standing hypotheses, but in others, results appear to conflict with existing morphological species concepts. This work reports on recent progress regarding two main issues: (i) cryptic species, i.e., two or more independent lineages exhibiting similar morphology; and (ii) species pairs, two species with similar morphology but exhibiting different reproductive modes. Both concepts have in common a lack of correlation between phylogenetic and morphological data, at least for characters normally used in lichen systematics. We review the available literature on cryptic species and species pairs, focusing especially on the family Parmeliaceae (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota). Molecular data have repeatedly demonstrated the existence of cryptic species in lichenized fungi, although taxonomists have often been slow to recognize the resulting taxa. However, careful observation of fine-scale morphological, ecological and/or geographical features tends to provide support for the recognition of these species. In the case of species pairs, by contrast, few if any of the pairs studied to date have been confirmed to consist of independent lineages. Differences in reproductive mode alone appear not to be a sufficient reason to recognise new species.

Highlights

  • The widespread use of molecular phylogenetic markers has led to a breakthrough in the understanding of life and its diversity and a kind of revolution in systematics

  • Systematists trained in observing morphological characters expect molecular phylogenies to corroborate or improve their previous hypotheses, but not rarely, molecular phylogenies produce a different picture of relationships between and among the organisms

  • Genetic status of so-called ‘species pairs’. Both concepts have in common a lack of correlation between phylogenetic and morphological data, at least for characters normally used in lichen systematics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The widespread use of molecular phylogenetic markers has led to a breakthrough in the understanding of life and its diversity and a kind of revolution in systematics. Both concepts have in common a lack of correlation between phylogenetic and morphological data, at least for characters normally used in lichen systematics. Lichens, are no the exception to this pattern; to the contrary, the pre-sence of convergent morphologies between phylogenetically distant groups is frequent (Blanco & al., 2004a, b; Grube & al., 2004; Molina & al., 2004; Schmitt & al., 2005; Grube & Hawksworth, 2007) It is well-known among naturalists and lichenologists that it is difficult to identify lichens in the field, even when one is dealing with a macrolichen, and non-experts can mistake species, but even the genus or the family. Different ecological behaviour has been used to validate the recognition of cryptic taxa, e.g. the occurrence of Parmelia serrana on bark versus P. saxatilis commonly on rock (Molina & al., 2004)

Cryptic species
Recognition of cryptic species lineages
Species pairs
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call