Abstract

We describe a new cryptic species of leopard frog from the New York City metropolitan area and surrounding coastal regions. This species is morphologically similar to two largely parapatric eastern congeners, Rana sphenocephala and R. pipiens. We primarily use bioacoustic and molecular data to characterize the new species, but also examine other lines of evidence. This discovery is unexpected in one of the largest and most densely populated urban parts of the world. It also demonstrates that new vertebrate species can still be found periodically even in well-studied locales rarely associated with undocumented biodiversity. The new species typically occurs in expansive open-canopied wetlands interspersed with upland patches, but centuries of loss and impact to these habitats give some cause for conservation concern. Other concerns include regional extirpations, fragmented extant populations, and a restricted overall geographic distribution. We assign a type locality within New York City and report a narrow and largely coastal lowland distribution from central Connecticut to northern New Jersey (based on genetic data) and south to North Carolina (based on call data).

Highlights

  • In order to develop clear understandings of species and their ecologies, distributions, and conservation needs, they must first be properly identified and accurately delimited [1]

  • We looked for univariate differences in species morphology using boxplots and one-way ANOVAs followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc pairwise comparisons

  • Data from the present study were added to the Newman et al [3] data set, and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were run in MrBayes 3.1 [56,57] for each locus following the analyses described in Newman et al [3] to verify the species identity of the holotype

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In order to develop clear understandings of species and their ecologies, distributions, and conservation needs, they must first be properly identified and accurately delimited [1]. Such efforts can be complicated, by the presence of cryptic species – species that, due to morphological similarity, have been incorrectly included with one or more other species under a single species classification [2]. Identifying cryptic species can be difficult though, which presents taxonomic and conservation challenges. These challenges can be further exacerbated in heavily altered environments and areas where extirpations and habitat loss have led to insufficient numbers of individuals or populations for sampling. Cryptic species can remain concealed among other species, which can be problematic if seemingly common or widespread nominal species contain hidden component species that are range-restricted, rare, or even extinct [1,2]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call