Abstract

Srivastava et al., recently proposed a hash based mutual RFID authentication protocol. They claimed that the protocol can provide several attractive security features, i.e., the mutual authentication and the resistance against the eavesdropping and tracing attack, the replay attack, the man-in-the-middle attack, and the desynchronization. However, we find that the protocol is vulnerable to a novel forgery attack presented in the paper. The forgery attack undermines the protocol in the mutual authentication and the resistance against both the man-in-the-middle attack and the desynchronization as claimed. In addition to the security vulnerability, the protocol is also inefficient in implementation, because it makes use of the timestamp and random number simultaneously. Therefore, the protocol is not suitable for the wireless security systems. We hope that our cryptanalysis results are useful to design more robust RFID authentication protocols for the wireless security systems in the future.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.