Abstract

Recently, a quantum private comparison (QPC) protocol with a dishonest third party (TP) (Yang et al. in Quantum Inf Process, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s11128-012-0433-4 ) was proposed, which pointed out that the assumption of semi-honest third party (TP) is unreasonable. Here we find this protocol is not so secure as it was expected, and then we give some improvement strategies, which ensure that both players' secrets will not be leaked to anyone. We also discuss the assumption for TP in QPC protocls, which gives a constructive suggestions for the design of a new QPC protocol.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call