Cryogenic vacuum distillation vs Cavitron methods in ecohydrology: Extraction protocol effects on plant water isotopic values

Abstract

Stable isotope ratios of hydrogen and oxygen in plant water are widely used for water tracing in ecohydrology studies. In this approach, plant water is extracted for isotopic analysis of δ2H and δ18O. Among the extraction methods, cryogenic vacuum distillation (CVD) has been the most popular, but its impact on the isotopic composition of plant water is currently under debate. Newer Cavitron method have been proposed to replace CVD method for xylem water extraction. These recommendations have been largely based on comparisons between Cavitron-xylem water with low temperatures CVD-xylem water. However, the CVD protocol (extraction temperature and time) varies widely across laboratories, and no direct, systematic comparison has yet been made between extraction temperature and time protocols vs. the Cavitron approach. Here we compared the isotopic values of xylem water from the same tree obtained through CVD extraction at 60 °C (60, 120, 240, 360 min), 100 °C (30, 60, 120, 240 min), 140 °C (15, 30, 60, 120, 240 min), and 200 °C (15, 30 min). Subsequently, we compared the results of CVD-xylem water with Cavitron-xylem water. Our data show that isotopic values for CVD-xylem water became more positive with increasing extraction time under the same extraction temperature. Such extractions also became more isotopically positive with increasing extraction temperature for the same extraction time. When total extraction efficiency exceeded 98 %, there was no δ18O difference in CVD-xylem water among any of the different protocols (p > 0.05). However, lower extraction temperatures resulted in more negative δ2H when compared to higher temperature extraction (p < 0.05). Cavitron-xylem water was close to CVD-xylem water (average difference of 3 ‰ for δ2H and 0.5 ‰ for δ18O, n = 79) when total extraction efficiency for CVD was below 98 %. But for extraction efficiencies beyond 98 %, the Cavitron-xylem water was more negative in δ2H (17.3 ‰, n = 70) and δ18O (1.7 ‰, n = 70) than CVD-xylem water. Compared to Cavitron-xylem water, CVD-xylem water at 200 °C with extraction efficiency > 98 % was closer to the soil water. Further study is necessary to conduct a complete cross-comparison between Cavitron and CVD at different temperatures with different species at various water and salt stress conditions. But our results suggest that abandoning CVD for plant water maybe premature until such complete comparison work is done.