Cryogenic chilling of pork carcasses: Effects on muscle quality, bacterial populations and palatability

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of cryogenic chilling on the carcass shrinkage, meat quality, bacterial condition and palatibility of pork. In experiment I, pork sides were chilled at 1°C ( n = 20), or immersed in liquid nitrogen (LN) for 1 or 3 min prior to placement in a 1°C cooler. Muscle temperature in the loin was significantly lower at 2 and 6 h post mortem in treated compared to control sides, and loin muscle pH was higher ( P < 0·05) at 6 h post mortem in sides immersed for 3 min in LN. Carcass side shrinkage was reduced from 29·3 g kg −1 in control sides to 20·9 and 13·5 g kg −1 in sides dipped in LN for 1 and 3 min. Chilling treatment had no significant effect on the survival of mesophilic bacteria on carcass sides, on meat colour, drip loss, protein solubility or sarcomere length, but sides dipped for 1 min in LN has a higher muscle shear value than control sides. In experiment II, carcass sides from halothane positive (H+) and negative (H−) pigs were conventionally chilled ( n = 49), immersed in LN for 3 min ( n = 23), or electrically stimulated and chilled in LN for 3 min ( n = 26). Similar results for temperature, pH, colour, protein solubility and drip loss in loin muscle were found to those in experiment I. Laboratory taste panel results showed that chilling treatment had no effect on palatability. Genotype produced meaningful differences in most palatability attributes with H+ pigs having less tender, less juicy and less desirable flavour than pork from H− pigs. Laboratory studies with inoculated fresh muscle slices showed that a 3 min immersion in LN resulted in a 10-fold reduction in the aerobic spoilage pseudomonads, but effects upon other spoilage bacteria and potential human pathogens were less pronounced. It was concluded that cryogenic chilling using LN reduced carcass shrinkage during cooling, but had no consistent effects on meat quality, palatability or bacterial numbers on the carcass. In contrast, genotype had a significant effect on most pork quality and palatability attributes.